Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
Губин назвал причину отказа от возвращения на сцену14:49
，更多细节参见一键获取谷歌浏览器下载
Андрей Ставицкий (Редактор отдела «Наука и техника»)
Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts in your inbox。Safew下载是该领域的重要参考
3000余名中国公民自伊朗撤离，推荐阅读搜狗输入法获取更多信息
Now consider the consequences of a sycophantic AI that generates responses by sampling examples consistent with the user’s hypothesis: d1∼p(d|h∗)d_{1}\sim p(d|h^{*}) rather than from the true data-generating process, d1∼p(d|true process)d_{1}\sim p(d|\text{true process}). The user, unaware of this bias, treats d1d_{1} as independent evidence and performs a standard Bayesian update, p(h|d1,d0)∝p(d1|h)p(h|d0)p(h|d_{1},d_{0})\propto p(d_{1}|h)p(h|d_{0}). But this update is circular. Because d1d_{1} was sampled conditional on hh, the user is updating their belief in hh based on data that was generated assuming hh was true. To see this, we can ask what the posterior distribution would be after this additional observation, averaging over the selected hypothesis h∗h^{*} and the particular piece of data generated from p(d1|h∗)p(d_{1}|h^{*}). We have